InvestorsHub Logo

sukus

12/05/22 5:02 PM

#544025 RE: hankmanhub #544022

Very nice Hank. Thanks for sharing.

pqr

12/05/22 5:26 PM

#544035 RE: hankmanhub #544022

Hank - will lawsuit address naked shorts? As I posted before plaintiffs lawyers wisely plead their strongest case. Purpose being, stick around as long as possible. So there are of course publicly available records of trades that NWBO says show spoofing. Records that NWBO and their attorneys can access and say they have accessed.

Records of naked shorting are I expect (not surprisingly) NOT available through public means. But non-public information like that if the filed case is framed properly would be discoverable. So you build on that. So, IMO, would be communications
between named defendants (MMs) and potential co-conspirators seeking to benefit from spoofing or other proven illegal trading behaviors. Which could be … “journalists,” publishers, BP who financially support MMs, makes shorter if those can be identified, etc.

CherryTree1

12/05/22 5:42 PM

#544044 RE: hankmanhub #544022

Yes that is why some of these people need to go to jail.
Million dollar fines might appear hefty but they are no more than a round error when you understand that annual revenues from cancer treatments are $308 billion in 2022 and increasing every year.
https://www.precedenceresearch.com/oncology-market
For example a $20 million fine is 0.065% of $308 billion . . .meaningless rounding error.
But no one is going to jail.
SEC and DOJ aren't even involved as far as anyone knows at this point.
Bullish
Bullish