InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dr Bala

12/05/22 2:21 PM

#543901 RE: exwannabe #543898

Irrelevant nonsense after the highly successful P3 results and their publication in a top journal.

icon url

dr_lowenstein

12/05/22 2:26 PM

#543906 RE: exwannabe #543898

thanks. FACTS matter
icon url

hoffmann6383

12/05/22 2:29 PM

#543909 RE: exwannabe #543898

It's 2022. Not 2007 or 2015.

The trial is complete despite what shorts have claimed.

The trial was statistically and clinically significant despite what shorts claim.

Manufacturing certification in the UK is going to happen any minute despite what shorts claim.

The PIP was approved using the same trial design despite what shorts have said.

The FDA issued their Final Guidance on ECAs despite what shorts claim.

There was one SAP despite what shorts have said.

The SAP was completed prior to unblinding despite what shorts have claimed.

The journal article was published in a top tier journal despite what shorts have said.

NWBO plans to submit multiple applications for RA approvals despite what shorts have said.

There was documented illegal manipulation in the share price despite what shorts claim.

The combo trials have showed amazing results despite what shorts have said.

UCLA continues to use Murcidencel in SPORE trials despite what shorts have said.


I could go on but it is clear we have an ever shifting short narrative.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

JimSmith111

12/05/22 2:29 PM

#543910 RE: exwannabe #543898

Prior iterations of similar criticisms in years past would have said about 6 more negative things.

But current iterations of the criticisms just can't do that t anymore because all 6 of those negative things have actually come to fruition in a positive way.

I would love to see the list of criticisms from just 2 years ago, then be able to go back at it today and see how many are crossed off. A LOT OF BIG ONES YEAH BABY, WOOHOOOO!
icon url

dennisdave

12/05/22 4:24 PM

#544003 RE: exwannabe #543898

Jeez ex get over yourself in 2007 in 2015.

The First Crusade (1096–1099) was the first of a series of religious wars,
Do you agree with this?

Ooh sorry I thought you liked history
icon url

SkyLimit2022

12/05/22 5:03 PM

#544026 RE: exwannabe #543898

I hear you. I am a recent investor and wasn’t around all those years ago.

I would recommend focusing more on the science and less on the noise online. The business side is important too, but it can also be messy and frustrating.

Murcidencel is not a share price—it is a medical technology that extends lives. Stocks go up and down and are manipulated. It is the science and lives that matter of course. The share price will soon follow and the medicine will reach patients globally.

I have found that the doctors are the most clear and accurate. I am interested to hear from everyone, but I am interested to hear the doctors’ words most of all.

Webinar with Dr. Linda Liau
December 5, 2022
8:30 PM Eastern Time
Topic: DCVax-L (murcidencel)


https://virtualtrials.org/webinar/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847




Bullish
Bullish
icon url

biosectinvestor

12/05/22 7:34 PM

#544128 RE: exwannabe #543898

LP was new and I believe the old guys were still in charge in fact and she was on the board and then corrected that, but yeah, lots of really old stuff you need to dig for and try to suggest was more important than it in fact is. The reality is, JAMA published and the results are the results. Nothing you can try to dredge up and try to use to discolor reality can change actual reality. It’s a waste of time.