InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dr Bala

12/04/22 7:04 PM

#543484 RE: HyGro #543471

Irrelevant nonsense. LP has achieved the goal of P3 success with NWBO.
icon url

biosectinvestor

12/04/22 7:11 PM

#543494 RE: HyGro #543471

Has nothing to do with the scandals that later came up because of a very few in the c-suite at the top of the hierarchy of companies, who did certain transactions to hide problems. Nothing to do with LP.
icon url

Roman516

12/04/22 7:14 PM

#543500 RE: HyGro #543471

Why bother with Enron focus on NWBO.
Linda Powers and Enron
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/linda-powers-a-keen-eye-for-the-right-opportunities
icon url

SkyLimit2022

12/04/22 7:16 PM

#543502 RE: HyGro #543471

Yes, I agree. She is a wise and strategic thinker and has demonstrated great foresight. She was likely one of the best the company ever had. Perhaps if she had stayed with the corporation, maybe they could have averted their disgraceful demise.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

LearningEveryTrade

12/05/22 12:53 AM

#543614 RE: HyGro #543471

25 years ago job resume dredging. Embarrasing.
The Enron scandal was an accounting scandal involving Enron Corporation

Until 1997, Linda Powers was Senior VP, Global Finance, Enron International (operating subsidiary) NOT to be confused or comingled with the "Corporation."

Enron International (EI) was Enron's wholesale asset development and asset management business. Its primary emphasis was developing and building natural gas power plants outside North America. Enron Engineering and Construction Company (EECC) was a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron International, and built almost all of Enron International's power plants. Unlike other business units of Enron, Enron International had a strong cash flow on bankruptcy filing.[citation needed] Enron International consisted of all of Enron's foreign power projects, including ones in Europe.

So, having a strong cash flow, well, she was doing a great job running that foreign Power Plant Building company.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

biosectinvestor

12/05/22 2:38 PM

#543918 RE: HyGro #543471

This has nothing to do with the issues. It’s an entirely separate subsidiary and was not the cause of the downfall. The main entity, which she was not invoked with and she was not a c-suite executive had entered into derivative off-balance sheet transactions. Only the top guys were fully aware of those transactions and Arthur Anderson, their auditor looked the other way. And some substantial part in the downfall was triggered by the dot com crash.

LP was building power plants, nothing to do with downfall. She was a VP, not anywhere near the c-suite, in a subsidiary, and she left 4 years before any of that happened. She was a lawyer, not an accountant.

Enron was a huge company. And, in fact, though there were some bad people as in some of these huge scandals, 99% of the rest of the people just did their jobs. And she left years before any of that nonsense happened, was not part of the main company but a subsidiary and she was a lawyer and part of their that built power plants. Enron built a lot of the newest and greenest plants at that time in fact and was a leader in that area.

Your lies are outrageous.