Thank you for posting your views about the study of the murcidencel cell-based technology and its efficacy.
I would argue that we need to be cautious about medical statements published without sources—medical claims must be supported by licensed physicians—online medical disinformation presents risks.
In my opinion, a lot of unsubstantiated negative information about murcidencel has originated from rumors and baseless innuendo published on social media to muddy the reputation of the company and benefit those attempting to short the stock.
More importantly, social media is not a safe and reliable source of info about any drug. Verify what you find posted on social media. Consult professionals and seek trustworthy full-context sources.
The JAMA independent peer review of the murcidencel (DCVax-L) P3 study is one of the independent sources available to the public and to the medical community. Licensed independent physicians and qualified skilled statisticians have validated the results that were published by the medical journal under the guidance of their editorial board and in cooperation with the independent professionals who participated in the review process. The independent review has validated the significance of this landmark study, its design, and its data.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
