InvestorsHub Logo

tradeherpete

12/04/22 8:09 AM

#388582 RE: hnbadger1 #388581

It’s a competitive environment and Anavex is competing. They came to the lions den and showed both primary endpoints of their trial were met.

That’s a win.

Anavex can’t control the unbalanced playing field where the terms are agreed upon, then removed to suit the convenience of the supposedly impartial sanctioning body.

ExtremelyBullishZig

12/04/22 8:30 AM

#388586 RE: hnbadger1 #388581

Only if the PR said they didn't have data in time as a reason for not attending CTAD. Without that...a PR a Couple days after CTAD would make people wonder why such great news was not good enough to be presented at CTAD and would have drawn the same or probably a worse conclusion until another followup CC explained.

sumbuysumsell

12/04/22 9:19 AM

#388598 RE: hnbadger1 #388581

Not likely. There would have been an attack irregardless. It may have even been much worse. Can you imaging the screams of missing a self imposed deadline and the angst of why is it taking so long sine they must have had the data 6 months ago........