Replies to post #209349 on Just Politics

[BullNBear52]

3-0 for the slam dunk.
The appeals court was sharply critical of the decision in September by Judge Aileen M. Cannon, a Trump appointee who sits in the Southern District of Florida, to intervene in the case. The court said Judge Cannon never had legitimate jurisdiction to order the review or bar investigators from using the files, and that there was no justification for treating Mr. Trump differently from any other target of a search warrant.

“It is indeed extraordinary for a warrant to be executed at the home of a former president — but not in a way that affects our legal analysis or otherwise gives the judiciary license to interfere in an ongoing investigation,” the court wrote.

Limits on when courts can interfere with a criminal investigation “apply no matter who the government is investigating,” it added. “To create a special exception here would defy our nation’s foundational principle that our law applies ‘to all, without regard to numbers, wealth or rank.’”

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/01/us/politics/trump-special-master.html

And Cannon should be facing sanctions for her even involving herself. Or better yet kick her off the bench.

And the SCOTUS better not even think of taking up an appeal if they want to retain any credibility.