No I believe that to case but what I believe and what you can prove are 2 separate things. If you’re arguing that these companies were the source of the decline, you would have to prove it AND prove the amount of damages. It would be extremely difficult requiring experts. The other side would provide experts saying that is not the case. Remember that the plaintiff has the burden of proving its case. If I was defending that case, I would argue other bad actors like AF were the cause of the decline. The best thing the Company can do is go with the slam dunk win. The bigger thing is it may stop the manipulation.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
