InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jimtash

11/15/22 7:16 PM

#25912 RE: Kool Aid Man #25910

No way in hell Tad knew of or allowed that post by Patel on Facebook. And that was the original intended PR. Somewhere along the lines is was changed to include the split. And the audit was added by Tad as a result of the Nov 3 post. IMO..
icon url

Doctorday

11/15/22 7:21 PM

#25913 RE: Kool Aid Man #25910

As all that have been in the game for a long time, I have had losses on various stocks over the course of the past 20+ years but this is the first time where the con was so blatantly and proudly portrayed.

This is the first time I'm considering filing an SEC complaint. You can't just go around announcing merger completions followed a week later by LOL we lied it's not complete and you're getting a reverse split, and then when investors ask about it you either ignore them, dismiss them directly as being unimportant, or even post to reprimand them all collectively for responding to the CEO's posts with banter about what is supposedly intended to be stock in his company.

I have never seen a ceo repeatedly mess up or show disdain for investors so many times in the span of a couple of weeks.

He's doing everything but straight up demanding that we all sell because I guess that would be illegal. Lol
icon url

shinytrout

11/16/22 11:30 AM

#25982 RE: Kool Aid Man #25910

Question would be is to how this "Official" looking release ever came about? It seems unlikely for Ken to create this himself. If not, how did it come into his possession? Was he led to believe that the deal had closed? An active participant or a patsy? Could be the real boogeyman is behind another door.