InvestorsHub Logo

trding

11/01/22 1:31 AM

#215245 RE: 3X Charm #215244

If that’s true it should be an open and shut case. There’s lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics. I always found his PRs to be technically accurate. I just read the FDA complaint. And I believe he might be technically accurate there as well. He was comparing stats in a sub population of the trial, critical and those on ventilators. The issue is that sub population was not randomly assigned, so you can’t just compare numbers from a sub population. you would need a new trial to verify.

Another example, I followed the mono numbers. I believe his stats where also true, but he started focusing on after week 10, there was a 90% success… well you need to include week 1-9 to get the full stat, but the stat was accurate.

jimmy667

11/01/22 2:04 AM

#215246 RE: 3X Charm #215244

Well now that was then this is now. Bravo to the shorts,well played. However if one can not close out the short position now one might very well be Eff You Sea Kay'd.