Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[trding]

If that’s true it should be an open and shut case. There’s lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics. I always found his PRs to be technically accurate. I just read the FDA complaint. And I believe he might be technically accurate there as well. He was comparing stats in a sub population of the trial, critical and those on ventilators. The issue is that sub population was not randomly assigned, so you can’t just compare numbers from a sub population. you would need a new trial to verify.

Another example, I followed the mono numbers. I believe his stats where also true, but he started focusing on after week 10, there was a 90% success… well you need to include week 1-9 to get the full stat, but the stat was accurate.