InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tooflets

02/13/07 6:11 PM

#27912 RE: Connecticut #27905

There have been NO official PR's about production or stockpiling of endproducts, contracts, sales, or even that USSEC is using their juice to run their own generator. As a longterm investor in this stock I look forward to any or all of the above.

I haven't contacted JR because I'm pretty sure he has much more important things to do right now than talk with a minor stockholder. Besides, anyone at the other end can pick up the phone and claim they're JR and say what they think you want to hear. I prefer my PR's out in the light-of-day where the public and the SEC, or whoever, can hold people and companies accountable for what's stated.

You're diligent at research, and I thanked you for that - keep it up, but not much you've produced so far is verifiable as fact, only fodder for further speculation.
icon url

PaperProphet

02/13/07 6:22 PM

#27913 RE: Connecticut #27905

Re:<What I was stating was the plant runs daily to have 'shows' for future clients!>

Well, that would certainly answer one of my questions which Mr. Davis was so reluctant to answer--the purpose of Freeus.

So if true, it appears that the Freeus reactor tube (which may or may not be the same tube just moved from Port Gibson) has the same purpose as production did in Port Gibson--to produce fuel for show and possibly more R&D. Those lofty goals of actually using the fuel for a commercial purpose...out the window.

Apparently Freeus isn't the link which would satisfy Mr. Rivera's late-October claims of revenue in 8 to 10 weeks.