InvestorsHub Logo

BBANBOB

10/31/22 3:44 PM

#697870 RE: Uncle RD #697868

BP Investigative Agency
Forensic "Securitization" Auditing, Chain of Title Analysis, Legal Support Services, Bonded & Insured
1-888-582-0961

Home
About Us
Products & Services
FAQs
Testimonials
Contact Us

Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Why JPMorgan Chase Did Not Purchase Ownership Of $615B Worth Of WaMu Loans In Three Simple Steps
Posted by Bill Paatalo on Jul 24, 2017 in Uncategorized | 0 comments

Here is a simple “3-step Analysis” to show that “ownership” of at least $615,000,000,000.00 ( just about the same number the SEN SUB comm on banking came up with as well)(over half a TRILLION Dollars!) of WaMu loans were not purchased by JPMorgan Chase from the FDIC.

STEP 1:

The U.S. Senate Sub-Committee (Levin – Coburn Report) reveals in its findings of fact that WaMu sold and securitized at least $615B of residential mortgage loans through its subsidiaries “WaMu Asset Acceptance Corporation” and “Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation” who acted as “Depositors” in the securitization transactions.

See:

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/media/senate-investigations-subcommittee-releases-levin-coburn-report-on-the-financial-crisis



Pg. 116 –

From 2000 to 2007, Washington Mutual and Long Beach securitized at least $77 billion in subprime and home equity loans. WaMu also sold or securitized at least $115 billion in Option ARM loans. Between 2000 and 2008, Washington Mutual sold over $500 billion in loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, accounting for more than a quarter of every dollar in loans WaMu originated.



Pg. 119 –

“WaMu Capital Corp. acted as an underwriter of securitization transactions generally involving Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. or WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. Generally, one of the two entities would sell loans into a securitization trust in exchange for securities backed by the loans in question, and WaMu Capital Corp. would then underwrite the securities consistent with industry standards.

STEP 2:

See: Page 2. – PAA – (click here: FDIC-Chase – PAA)

“Assets” means all assets of the Failed Bank purchased pursuant to Section 3.1. Assets owned by Subsidiaries of the Failed Bank are not “Assets” within the meaning of this definition.”

STEP 3:

In the case of Fox v. JPMorgan Chase, a specific REMIC Trust is named in the action. To prevail on its argument that the loan was sold and transferred to the Trust, JPMorgan Chase and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee, both admitted / “stipulated” that the loan contained both investor codes “AO1” and “369” in the loan transfer history, which means the loan was sold by Washington Mutual Bank to the subsidiaries prior to those subsidiaries transferring the loan into the Trust. AND, it was stipulated that the loan was NOT PURCHASED FROM THE FDIC.

(Click here: Chase Stipulated Fact – AO1 – WMAAC)

Stipulated Facts:

“8. Investor Code AO1 in the Loan Transfer History File represents WaMu Asset Acceptance Corporation.”

“9. Investor Code 369 in the Loan Transfer History File represents Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation.”

“10. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. did not purchase the loan from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.”



In the Fox case, “JPMorgan Chase” and “U.S. Bank as Trustee,” have taken a position that universally applies to all $615B of these securitized loans.

Each one of these loan transactions will show either the investor code “AO1,” “369,” or both somewhere in the “Loan Transfer History” screenshots within the servicing system, and as such, the loans were not purchased from the FDIC.

The presumptions that Chase has relied upon in order to maintain its position in thousands of foreclosure proceedings that (1) it acquired the loans through the PAA, and (2) the assignments of beneficial-ownership interests to the loans unto itself as “attorney-in-fact” for the FDIC have now been debunked by its own admissions! Unless of course, you were to believe in the [1/1,000,000] proposition that the Fox loan was the only loan not included in the receivership.





Bill Paatalo Oregon Private Investigator – PSID#49411

BP Investigative Agency, LLC P.O. Box 838

Absarokee, MT 59001 Office: (406) 328-4075

bill.bpia@gmail.com


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recent Posts

“MERSCORP cannot hold liens owned or serviced by terminated members.” DreamBuilder Invs. v. Merscorp Holdings, Inc.
Attacking The Powerless And Deceptive “Limited Power Of Attorney” Documents In Foreclosure Litigation.
Chase Discovery Demand #1: Produce The WaMu “Servicing Agreement(s)” With All “Approvals & Consents”
New Residential Investment Corp Explains Why Trusts Are Utilized; To Evade State Laws
Attention All Oregonians Whose WaMu Deeds Were Foreclosed By JPMorgan Chase

Comments

Fred R Schneider on Chase Discovery Demand #1: Produce The WaMu “Servicing Agreement(s)” With All “Approvals & Consents”
izraul on FDIC Exposed In Its On-Going “Cover-Up” Of Washington Mutual Bank Loans
Izraul on WaMu’s securitized mortgages were “legally isolated” and out of the reach of the FDIC’s Receivership. Hence, “Nemo dat quod non habet” (One cannot give what one does not have).
Leah Dean on FOIA Request Reveals Servicer’s “Justification” For Fraud In Obtaining Limited Power Of Attorney From FDIC
Bill Freeman on JPMorgan Chase Ordered To Produce Wire Transfers Of Borrower’s Payments To Trust

Archives

June 2022
May 2022
September 2021
July 2021
February 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
July 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
December 2016
November 2016
August 2016
July 2016
February 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
June 2015
April 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
April 2014
March 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2010

Home
About Us
Products & Services
FAQs
Testimonials
Contact Us

© 2018-2022 . All Rights Reserved. BP Investigative Agency | Terms & Conditions
Website By:
Back to Top