InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

1maga1

10/24/22 1:06 PM

#95784 RE: VC3 #95782

Excellent questions, imagine that
icon url

AllinFun

10/24/22 1:06 PM

#95785 RE: VC3 #95782

Why did Bentham receive 20-25% net of attorney fees if the case was on contingency? More hogwash that the opposition can’t get their lies to add up with each other. They are lying for a reason. And that reason is very simple. I’m not sure how this is confusing to some.
icon url

zombywolf

10/24/22 1:30 PM

#95788 RE: VC3 #95782

I was told the patents have little to no future value. They were never taken to international agencies, so no value there either. That was direct from the source.
icon url

I-Glow

10/25/22 6:26 PM

#95797 RE: VC3 #95782

Carter made the deal with Bentham and the Attorneys - and it seems that Carter was living off some of the money meant for legal fees.

I don't believe it is that unusual since patent infringement cases can go on for years - there has to be some payment or the Attorneys would be filing for bankruptcy.

IG