The Judge dismissed the plaintiffs motion with good cause of changing attorneys and the defendants do not oppose and the judge still said no and dismissed it?
Its saying to the Plaintiffs to stop horsing around. She might think its a tactic. To me its not good . But your asking kthomp, I am just budding in. Lol. Good info though. Thanks
It's potentially the most important case of all, because its claims are derivative and it challenges events from 2008 (though not to get them overturned, just to be used in calculating money damages due to the companies).
Unfortunately, derivative takings claims are on life support right now, having been dismissed by the CAFC. I really, really hope that the Supreme Court grants cert on the derivative takings claims. The government has until November 8 to deliver their reply to the plaintiffs' excellent petition, and we should hear whether or not cert is granted by late this year or early next year.
We have had many out-of-nowhere kicks in the rear by the court system. The Supreme Court denying cert would be yet another one. It would also kill the Kelly case.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
