Re.: "The problem is that 'fluff' doesn't hack it any more. To get the stock price up is going to take something much more substantial than wild self generated market projections of a billion dollars."
GS, I agree with what you are saying about the stock price. A quick look at today's trading suggests you are right. There is still a lot of skepticism about this company out there. To propel the stock, we need to see more substantial news than just "we are beginning to work on this...". We need news of new licensees or the scheduled release of a product.
I'm sticking with this because the story they have been telling over the last few years is coherent and compelling, and has been validated by the leading diagnostics company, as well as the leading experts in the cancer marker domain. But the Abbott deal is getting to be old news and the market has known about the involvement of Gold and other luminaries for a long time. Clearly some fresh validation by independent parties is needed soon to take us forward.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
