InvestorsHub Logo

LakeshoreLeo1953

10/14/22 1:39 PM

#377700 RE: Investor2014 #377695

I believe Moderate hope for successful investigative trial(s)
has been the appropriate approach to AVXL, even if trading styles may differ.

May not beat the Blind Squirrel who claims to have known all along
since .25 and devoted 100% of their portfolio, but not unhappy to date.

Still feel further "proof" will be required, but agree won't be a failure announcement.

ExtremelyBullishZig

10/14/22 3:01 PM

#377743 RE: Investor2014 #377695

Do you believe the following to be true:

They use positive titles when they are excited about results like with PDD...even though it was a failed study.

imho

10/14/22 5:31 PM

#377780 RE: Investor2014 #377695

Of course it tells us little about just how good the topline data will be smile, but likely not a complete flop.

What is not in the title may tell us more than what is in the title. 1) No "proof of concept". That is good. 2) No "pivotal". Good if it was there but not expected to be there in the first place.

Maybe making too much of all that. Anything else?

IMHO