What you "believe" has no bearing on the facts. If IFUS owns the property, it could be easily proved and at no cost. IFUS will not do so. Why? Public proclamations, PRs, tweets and "Word Salads" do not constitute proof.
Why should anyone accept the word of a man with a long, long history of perpetrating scams in publicly traded companies and with a 14 year record of absolute malfeasance and failure in this one, in particular?
What are these low-lifes hiding?.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
