Responding to my question regarding what you meant with 'amplified', you said: As you know with LD AIM you pretend you have more shares than you really do and your min trade size is 10% rather than 5% so your trade sizes are bigger than with standard AIM owning the same # of shares
OK. fair enough, but min trade size is an input and is % of PC in calculations. A 2:1 relative min trade size does not come into play at all in any LD-AIM Calcs versus Classic AIM.
Apparently some myths have evolved regarding LD-AIM. ;-) I'm thinking about prepping and posting some info on LD-AIM to dispel them and hopefully clarify. I might need to do a little more clarification in the actual worksheet as well. I wouldn't want to be the genesis of more myths.