Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:34:33 AM
Good Morning Toof.
Responding to my question regarding what you meant with 'amplified', you said:
As you know with LD AIM you pretend you have more shares than you really do and your min trade size is 10% rather than 5% so your trade sizes are bigger than with standard AIM owning the same # of shares
OK. fair enough, but min trade size is an input and is % of PC in calculations.
A 2:1 relative min trade size does not come into play at all in any LD-AIM Calcs versus Classic AIM.
Apparently some myths have evolved regarding LD-AIM.
I'm thinking about prepping and posting some info on LD-AIM to dispel them and hopefully clarify. I might need to do a little more clarification in the actual worksheet as well.
I wouldn't want to be the genesis of more myths.
Responding to my question regarding what you meant with 'amplified', you said:
As you know with LD AIM you pretend you have more shares than you really do and your min trade size is 10% rather than 5% so your trade sizes are bigger than with standard AIM owning the same # of shares
OK. fair enough, but min trade size is an input and is % of PC in calculations.
A 2:1 relative min trade size does not come into play at all in any LD-AIM Calcs versus Classic AIM.
Apparently some myths have evolved regarding LD-AIM.
I'm thinking about prepping and posting some info on LD-AIM to dispel them and hopefully clarify. I might need to do a little more clarification in the actual worksheet as well.
I wouldn't want to be the genesis of more myths.
Best Regards, Steve (The Grabber)
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
