Funny how millions of shares manage to trade at $0 (see screenshot below). Last time I looked $0 was well below your "absolute bottom of $.0001." Each of the following days opened & closed at $0 despite the volume reported--
So, yeah, NASDAQ logs transactions below .0001 as >$0< as they just did for BDGR's "CLOSE/LAST (trade)" and daily "LOW" on WEDNESDAY (at .000001). They also marked the daily "LOW" on FRIDAY (.00005) as "$0" this week because how many times does a hair need to be split? Unless I'm mistaken .000001 is 1/1,000,000th (one one millionth) of a cent https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/bdgr/historical
Suffice it to say... shares ARE apparently exchanged BELOW .0001 because NASDAQ shows it happening so that proves you wrong..again. But, as I said before, that doesn't necessarily mean these trades/ swaps/ exchanges always have to involve cash as you seem to insist.
On Friday BDGR reportedly had 45 trades and a volume of 156,355,900. The open was .0.0001 Low: 0.000001 High: 0.0001 and a Close: 0.00005 resulting in a reported "Dollar Volume" of >>$15,542<< which is defined as
But if EVERY TRADE has to always be at a minimum of .0001 as you insist, then the "dollar volume" would have had to have be $4,159,333 on Friday alone (156,355,900 x .0001) --not $15.5k and have more than doubled the market cap of this pig.
BDGR opened Friday at .0001 --hit a low of .000001-- and closed down 50% at .00005. So please explain how over 56 million shares traded at your required .0001 resulted in such a low "Dollar Volume" and an end of day Market Cap --"verified" on FRIDAY based on a share value of >>$0.00005<< ( $1,747,639/ 34,952,777,778= 0.00005)-- of $1.75 million.
Fridays close proves what the market values BDGR at.. -85% below .0001. The lint in your navel is worth more than this trash. But have it your way if you like. A dead pig cut into 35 billion slices at .0001 each is is still a dead pig. Enjoy.