InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Basin Street Blues

09/06/22 3:00 PM

#511495 RE: flipper44 #511493

Didn’t LG and DI say numerous times to their regular callers friends the application in itself is material and would be PR’d though ?
icon url

skitahoe

09/06/22 3:14 PM

#511498 RE: flipper44 #511493

Flipper, while I love the way your numbers work out, Dr. Liau couldn't possibly know of a U.K. approval with certainty, but if it were announced prior to her speech, she could certainly work it into the narrative, and perhaps into the slides. As long as the submission was public, she certainly could state that, and that might be something that isn't in the Journal.

I don't believe that Dr. Liau is personally involved in preparing the submission to the regulators, but of course much of the data gathered from the trial where she was Lead Clinician supports it.

If you're correct about when submissions were made, and if approval of the production facility comes shortly, I believe the U.K. is eager to approve DCVax-L and it could actually occur as early as sometime in October. Certainly no guarantee they'll act that quickly, but the key is the okay on production facility, if that's done a month early I'd not be surprised if the regulators acted a month earlier than their target date. If would be unusual for our FDA to act that quickly, but even they could prove me wrong if the other regulators act either with the U.K. or shortly after the U.K. acts.

Gary
icon url

martyDg

09/06/22 3:51 PM

#511507 RE: flipper44 #511493

Wake me up when September and October ends.
icon url

abc1212

09/06/22 7:20 PM

#511568 RE: flipper44 #511493

flipper, thanks for the dates.

On the 90 days you may also need to add 1 day which was for the Bank Holiday on August 29th

This still means Thurs 10th November (1 day before the SNO abstracts which you say are released on the 11th)