.02 one..good..quest'with..challenges/problems..Yield_silence..+.twitter-come..ons which now seem almost not able to interpret as is
Then ,.what impression was created where twitter if reading as a come on .. is a support vehicle and which was the only pps mover and should/could be the bystander for a catalyst being the.. mover . in a chart slide that might be seen as something unexpected.
In contrast Yield .. taking buyers interest to lows that that leaves showing there is a shown intent which can act as a reason to cover ( but covering has need to not give needed details as to what is the reality ) can be used to to stay quiet indefinitely on twitter ?
..with transparency not shown as a priority to say the least on this one if it's said after long period of quiet.
Has top level sitting pretty with the significant situations not available to explain why was accounting not done as companies that are not with Yield signs. _ * * Plus the unthinkable of not getting done on time here to the new rules where otc De'lists stocks _ Correct me if wrong on brief problem summary above This is actually Not a post to bash
How does reading Twitter just in Ju'ly not going back to earlier months with out finding some catylist follow up
Leaves buyers/ holders interested in buying the science in a situation where one benefit is being non reporting? That's a hmm
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
