Replies to post #337833 on Amfil Technologies Inc (FUNN)

[shajandr]

10/10 - this is the correct response. Full credit.

Bonus question (5 points):

If The Clownshow stated in a public document that the shares were issued to LARRY for a debt and no such debt can be proven or was reported in prior financials, on what basis is that nott both a lie and potential securities fraud?

Theft, while IMO correct, wood bee much harder to prove in court. Butthay, one can try it. These insider self-dealing scams are typical in the insider-CONtrolled pennyturds like AMFE/FUNN/FUNNQ.

[Plowmaster]

The whole premise of the argument is false. So there is that.

There was debt reduction for some share issuances & Larry received shares in another instance

No one on a regulatory side is ever going to think differently or give a shit.

$FUNN