InvestorsHub Logo

AllinFun

08/15/22 11:05 AM

#95577 RE: I-Glow #95575

On the contrary, do you have any proof the settlement was with anyone outside of Cox? I guess you wouldn't as none of us would and that is why we are pursuing all information and details. But yet for some reason many here continue telling us it is absurd to continue pursuing.

Another note: Do you have any proof there was not a separate agreement in place with any of the defendants including but not limited too: Arris, Cisco, Comcast, etc. A purchase agreement contingent upon the settlement agreement with Cox (covered by their providers indemnification clauses). This is very standard information that is missing, but yet we are told to stop looking LOL!

AllinFun

08/15/22 11:10 AM

#95578 RE: I-Glow #95575

And again, you don't pursue a lawsuit for $130 million+ from the 1 infringer you are currently at court with (who happens to be a small amount of infringement amongst the group of 13) to then accept $125 million globally. If Carter wanted and needed money so bad that he was willing to accept $125 million, he would have got that a long time ago. The defendant had zero leverage giving up on the first day of trial realizing they were going to get their butts fried. There were other powers that be here and Carter had to make sure he got everything he could to pay off all of those he owes in his honorable lifestyle.