You know judge, even though the data is unblinded to insiders at this point, in a way we now have two data sets. The second data set is akin to long term follow up on the trial. Being that they can observe the data, it could be they (everyone working on the journal) are waiting on some obvious statistical time passage regarding some other secondary endpoints. Who knows, but I highly doubt this is a battle between editors and reviewers at this point. I’m flummoxed, but that’s my latest guess.