Replies to post #254326 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Stock_Barber]

Facts:
- to vacate or annul means it has no legal standing.

Exactly as myself and Jet stated to refute the fallacious argument that it made the ruling cease to exist. Vanish.

The revocation order by Judge Patil was, and is, real and it is in the permanent record of this case!

FULL STOP!



.



.

[Jetmek_03052]

More Bull!

Enforcement overreached again if they cited it as they were directed not to, particularly when evidence was provided thereafter as directed by SCOTUS and accepted by Judge Patil order of Jan 26,2018, Release 5543.

This revocation order IS PART of DBMM's RECORD and can be referred to by ANYONE that wants to refer back to it! No one can point to that revocation order and say DBMM was revoked because of it....and no one IS saying that.

SHOW US where SCOTUS directed ANYONE to not simply refer to it, as if it disappeared into thin air. It DID NOT disappear and the revocation order can OBVIOUSLY be referred to as part of the record of DBMM.

-the PFR is a review requested . It is a review. It is not a formal appeal as that would require a Motion in Federal Court.

IRRELEVANT. The PFR is ONGOING, DBMM will not advance to trading on the US. Markets without a ruling on it. This is OBVIOUS, as there has NEVER been company cleared to trade with a CE designation - and that will likely not be removed until the active OIP is cleared.


Suggest that opinion is NOT real. What is ACTUALLY HAPPENING is real :

The PFR is ongoing, there has BEEN NO DISMISSAL that took effect, the case CONTINUES to be extended (as it will once again be extended this September), and DBMM continues down the path towards bankruptcy.

MF brief is hollow. It only provides WEAK excuses for DBMM's intentional breaking of the filing statutes.

REAL FACTS RULE.