InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,187.70
(
0.13%
)
US TECH 100
17,617.63
(
0.04%
)
Dow Jones
38,884.26
(
0.08%
)
Brent Oil
82.71
(
-0.19%
)
Bitcoin
62,526.78
(
0.31%
)

Replies to post #6842 on Everlert Inc. (EVLI)

Replies to #6842 on Everlert Inc. (EVLI)

Hi_Lo

08/08/22 9:37 AM

#6844 RE: JMoneyHoops #6842

[Quote]Blankenship and Hymers likely want $$$ so the only way Sharp gets this is through the court process which he may try again after he gets GVS* Pink

I don't understand your logic.

Sharp is already trying to gain control of EVLI CURRENTLY with his court case which he recently quietly reopened and his recently sent letter to Blankenship. There is no indication that Sharp is waiting to "try again" after GVS* gets current. That's just opinion and false subjective speculation.

Plus GVS* getting current seems to be turning into a tall order.

GVSI was unable to get current through the SEC this year. Sharp went that route because he didn't have a choice. He had already been denied getting current through OTCIQ last year. He's going the OTCIQ route again this year out of desperation since the SEC denied GVSI getting current.

Straight from George Sharp:



George Sharp Retweeted
GVSI
@OTCpinkGVSI
$GOFF $SRNW $GVSI update (kind of). I hate posting this, but I got to get y'all off my back. Fins for these tickers are ready. Waiting for access to OTCIQ portal. Spoke with Issuer Serv's at OTCM & they are piled on. Entire army working on apps & expect 4-6 weeks from submission
Jul 26, 2021·Twitter Web App





[quoteI have acquired the books & records of $GVSI. Former mgmt will stay out of the way. Sec. Counsel is now working to update NV SOS which should be competed in the next day or so & access to OTC Markets is expected in the next couple of weeks. The Contempt Motion will be dismissed.
June 11, 2021

These two tweet prove that Sharp applied to OTCIQ in July of last year (OTCIQ'S response to GVS*'s application was never made public). The only way you can wait for access to OTCIQ is by submitting an application. Sharp even said he submitted an application for OTCIQ access last year - "entire army working on apps...expect 4-6 weeks from submission" - that would be submission of the application. Then just recently this year he said he was applying through OTCIQ (again???!!!) because he was denied getting current though the SEC.



George Sharp Retweeted
@OTCpinkGV*I
Our attorneys & auditors have concluded that it is impossible to audit $GV*I due to past corporate mismanagement of records/actions. Therefore, we are abandoning efforts to become an SEC reporter & are preparing an application for OTCIQ access to be filed with OTCM within 60 days
Jun 30, 2022·Twitter Web App



Sharp had applied through OTCIQ last year (see tweet above with link) and he also applied through the SEC this year (see tweet above with link) and both times getting GVS* current failed. He even stated to expect 4-6 weeks after submission (when he tweeted about GVS*'s application to OTCIQ in July of last year- see tweet above with link and date) for a response to his OTCIQ application. He never made that OTCIQ response to GVS*'s application public. He just didn't tweet anything concerning GVSI for about a year after applying to OTCIQ (not surprising given the problematic unresolved preferred shares). Very few people noted the fact that GVSI already applied for OTCIQ last year.

None of these problems ever happened with GOFF/WNFT or SRNW. They had a pretty smooth process getting current relatively quickly. That's why they will have successful reverse mergers soon.

GVS* on the other hand has problematic undesignated preferred shares that Sharp said he would petition the court to either assign designation or cancel. He never petitioned the court so they remain problematic and undesignated shares.

Not only that but the SEC denied GVSI getting current - incredibly something that was spun as being a positive. Not getting GVS* SEC registered and current is a positive???!!!

GVSI's only hope now is to get listed the sloppy and less attractive way - not through getting registered with the SEC (the highest standard) but through OTCIQ without audited financials - and even that is questionable since the problematic undesignated preferred shares haven't been resolved. What multi-billion dollar blockchain company would take the risk of merging into a shell with problematic undesignated preferred shares and unaudited financials? Answer: none.



$GVSI update, new hurdle I am jumping through is that previous mgmt issued Pref "A" stock without designating it with Nevada SOS, i.e. conversion/voting rate, etc. SEC is a stickler on this. We are petitioning the court to either allow us to cancel them or assign designation.



You can't get current when the designation of preferred shares aren't clear. A judge needs to assign designation for those preferred shares in question. Sharp said he would petition the court to do that. It never happened. Then Sharp said he applied and was waiting 4-6 weeks for a OTCIQ response to his application, a response that he never made public. So GVSI tried getting current through SEC this year and OTCIQ last year and both attempts failed.



$GVSI Motion for Requiring Written Proof of Claim went unopposed and we expect the court to sign off at any time. This will eliminate all third-party debts.



Where is the court sign off which is needed? Given the problematic preferred shares that Sharp said he would petition the court to resolve but never did? Why not simply wait to make it public once OTCIQ access was granted?

The court hasn't signed off and most likely won't given those problematic preferred shares that have never been resolved. Those problematic preferred shares won't simply go away by trying to get current via another route (again).



Today, my attorney is filing for custodianship of $GVSI on my behalf. Those buying shares must know that there is incredible risk here. My application could be denied. I could find really bad skeletons. Do not ask me questions regarding the progress. You will be blocked



Sharp NEVER gave a warning like this for GOFF/WNFT or SRNW. Now they are both current while GVSI is still stuck in expert market while it is denied again and again the ability to become current.

Notice that I supply links to back my argument. Sharp not being intetested in EVLI was proven false. The statement that Sharp hasn't contested Blankenship's motion to dismiss his court case against EVLI has also been proven false. Now it's said that Sharp is waiting for GVS* to get cutrent before doing anything with EVLI which has also been proven FALSE (given Sharp's recent letter to Blankenship and his current and open court case with motions submitted as recently as July).

There is a lot of false information being posted on this board and this board's intro/ibox.

It looks like Sharp's court case against EVLI is producing the desired affect - Blankenship is broke and can't hold on to a lawyer. It has yet to be seen if he can even retain another lawyer.

Bottom line. Things are looking positive for EVLI while GVS* can't seem to get current because of those problematic preferred shares that Sharp said hewould petition the court to assign designation or canc3l the shares. Sharp never petitioned the court so those problematic preferred shares were never resolved

GVS* is a disaster.