capt, I've been preoccupied just catching up on the recent posts. Something doesn't jive with the $9.6mill tainted product write-off or whatever they're calling it. To me, it sounds like double talk for inventory BS that's why the supplier didn't take the hit but amarin did? Really, they couldn't think of a better BS explanation as to why they took a hit somewhere else...bottomline someone is lying..... they screwed up. I'm going to ask IR for a better explanation.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
