Are you implying you have inside information about the journal article progress? Your history has called for management’s removal, so my estimation is you are using the dicey technique of pretending to know far more than you do and presenting unknown circumstances as known fact.
the peer group equation has been discussed here at great length. I suggest they call Flipper and he will sort it out for them lol
is this what you think what the hold-up is or what you have heard from a reliable source? I do think you would own people here that explanation when you make statements like that. Thanks