InvestorsHub Logo

satter

07/27/22 11:08 PM

#238469 RE: The_Riddler #238466

Well actually I think its closer to being fact. Eric at first, did not supply an actual accurate financial situation of the acquired company, but rather gave a distorted picture. The actual financial situation was supplied by myself here first.


https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168594137



I later made a reference on Twitter about it that caused Eric to go into a twitter storm that led him to falsely accused me of having gotten the info through privileged insider meeting. Later on Financial filing Eric then changed his description to state/reflect that the actual financial situation of the acquired company or assets from it was from Bankruptcy.


From the point as DrHarleyboy qualified in his post, ( from receivership mind you), Eric has not provided a single word about the actual financial situation of the acquired company. As far as I know that is a fact.

He has not provided any words of fiscal responsibility to the new acquisition, nor a single relevant document about any of the legal and financial process of the entire deal. Well I will have to correct myself because he has provided dialogue about the legal process of Vesting order, but DrHarleyboy said a single relevant document. I am not aware that Eric has provided a single document.


Here again, I did.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168855709


The last thing DrHarleyboy said about not any other entity wanting to acquire GT, I can't say that is a fact but none that any of us are aware of.


So if what he said is not fact supported from factual evidence, its opinion, a judgement based on facts, an honest attempt to draw a reasonable conclusion.


satter court rules 60/40 in favor of DrHarleyboy, decision can be appealed to the court with justices DDHOUND/doogdilinger, Good Luck, Lol

DrHarleyboy

07/28/22 8:15 AM

#238472 RE: The_Riddler #238466

Everything posted on a public forum about WNBD is considered "opinion", there is no need to preface any statement with that.

My post just happen to be an opinion on facts, relevant to the current events as they unfold. If anyone can point to the relevant documentation that covers the any of the details surrounding the acquisition (besides the obvious, un-informational vesting order) then I'll be glad to recognize those items.

Until then, Eric is just bloviating as usual.