InvestorsHub Logo

branster

07/15/22 9:25 PM

#495479 RE: skitahoe #495474

Skit, I will really will need to have some good reasoning from the Board and not from Investors in order for me to change my vote from a NO to a YES assuming ASM is held without a Journal and no new information is released. It really becomes a catch 22 for the Investor who wants to standup to the Board and have their voice heard by way of a NO vote, on the other hand if its voted down it puts the company in a precarious situation that would most likely impact the Investor negatively as well.

For some its like standing up to a Bully knowing good well you will get a Black Eye but on the other hand you may still get a Black Eye if you do nothing and give in. I guess eventually time will force an ending either way.
PATIENCE seems to be answer, but PATIENCE also has it limitations.

sentiment_stocks

07/15/22 9:55 PM

#495488 RE: skitahoe #495474

Agreed... if the journal is published first, they'll be able to more thoroughly discuss the trial results contained in the journal, and possibly a variety of other issues. I think it would result in a much happier, upbeat shareholder mindset, which would likely lend itself to a more supportive vote on any issue the Board is likely to recommend.