Replies to post #95403 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[shajandr]

I wrote:

Because the Federal District Court in NC had unquestionable personal (in personam) jurisdiction over WILLIAM Billy RALPH CARTER who was residing in the Middle District of North Carolina at the time.

Billy would be unable to parry that he was nott subject to in personam jurisdiction in the Middle District of Norff Carolina


This is a Federal District Court, nott a NC state court:

https://www.ncmd.uscourts.gov/

long uoip

Tuesday, March 01, 2022 12:51:48 AM

Re: long uoip post# 93449
Post# of 95403
Leane v. Carter

Monday, February 28, 2022
utility Motions Referred Mon 02/28 2:16 PM
Motion Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE re:16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. (Daniel, J)

North Carolina Middle District Court
Judge: William L Osteen, Jr
Referred: Joi Elizabeth Peake
Case #: 1:21-cv-00514
Nature of Suit 190 Contract - Other Contract
Cause 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Case Filed: Jun 22, 2021
Docket Parties (2)

Just as I wrote.

[shajandr]

This is a Federal District Court, nott a NC state court:

https://www.ncmd.uscourts.gov/

long uoip

Tuesday, March 01, 2022 12:51:48 AM

Re: long uoip post# 93449
Post# of 95403
Leane v. Carter

Monday, February 28, 2022
utility Motions Referred Mon 02/28 2:16 PM
Motion Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE re:16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. (Daniel, J)

North Carolina Middle District Court
Judge: William L Osteen, Jr
Referred: Joi Elizabeth Peake
Case #: 1:21-cv-00514
Nature of Suit 190 Contract - Other Contract
Cause 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Case Filed: Jun 22, 2021
Docket Parties (2)
Docket last updated: 51 minutes ago

aka The US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina - A United States Court (aka a Federal District Court) - nott a NC state court.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168040466