Replies to post #68542 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

There’s either treasure at Melbourne or there isn’t........

It’s as simple as that.

They submitted a “specimen” with the USPTO over 3 years ago and said it was a faster and more accurate device than anything on the market.

We’re talking a measly 6 sq miles, which could be magged in no time.

In the paid promo I linked this morning they were analyzing survey data a year ago. What’s the verdict?

Do they think determining the wreck and treasure is NOT THERE would be a negative?

Elimination of an area is part of the process.

Have you read anything on their bi-polar website lately? This is from an Aug 2018 entry.

Over the past decade the remains of another colonial period shipwreck was discovered off-shore of Melbourne Beach by the group – Seafarer Exploration Corp and associates – who through artifact analysis have now documented that this is a missing 1715 fleet vessel named the Santisima Trinidad y Nuestra Senora de la Concepcion – referred to simply as the – Concepcion. The Concepcion wreck scatter does not lie in ‘association’ with the other 1715 shipwreck sites on the Treasure Coast, but lies some 16 miles to the north of Sebastian Inlet on the Brevard County- ‘Space Coast’.

https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/the-303rd-anniversary-of-the-santisima-trinidad-y-nuestra-senora-de-la-concepcion-shipwreck/

This is on the Melbourne site info.

The 1715 Fleet was known to have carried significant treasure and historically valuable artifacts, although there is no guarantee of 100% accuracy of the origin of the wreck materials currently being found.

https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/melbourne-beach/

[Goldenboy17]

Ah yes.

Seafarer is criticized:

When they communicate with the public and when they do not communicate with the public.

When the price goes up and when the price goes down.

When the volume is high and when the volume is low.

When they have a new development and when they do not have a new development.

When they do something or when they don't appear to do anything.

When they announce what they expect to happen and when they do not announce what they expect to happen.

When they communicate to the public before something happens and if they make plans to communicate to the public after something happens.

When they promote something and when they purposely don't promote something.

When they hire someone or when they fire someone.

When Kennedy takes a salary and when he does not take a salary.

When family buys shares and when large investors buy shares.

When... well, I guess it could be a long list.

Eventually it will be when they find treasure. "Not enough!"

Basically it's every single thing they, the shareholders or anyone currently or previously associated with the company do – whether good or bad.

Now we are being told share price does not matter, fully reporting financials do not matter, being found liable is not guilty, and running scam companies is all part of doing business. Oh, wait, those rules only apply to EXPL.

All I know is that I would not take advice from entities that have no firsthand knowledge about the operations or understandings regarding the SFRX crew, officers, scientists or the capabilities of the SeaSearcher.

The best source of information is from the company and people who are actively engaged with the equipment, strategy and operations.

Good luck to all the shareholders of SFRX!