InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 513
Posts 60274
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: trueblue post# 68542

Thursday, 07/07/2022 1:53:55 PM

Thursday, July 07, 2022 1:53:55 PM

Post# of 77023
There’s either treasure at Melbourne or there isn’t........

It’s as simple as that.

They submitted a “specimen” with the USPTO over 3 years ago and said it was a faster and more accurate device than anything on the market.

We’re talking a measly 6 sq miles, which could be magged in no time.

In the paid promo I linked this morning they were analyzing survey data a year ago. What’s the verdict?

Do they think determining the wreck and treasure is NOT THERE would be a negative?

Elimination of an area is part of the process.

Have you read anything on their bi-polar website lately? This is from an Aug 2018 entry.

Over the past decade the remains of another colonial period shipwreck was discovered off-shore of Melbourne Beach by the group – Seafarer Exploration Corp and associates – who through artifact analysis have now documented that this is a missing 1715 fleet vessel named the Santisima Trinidad y Nuestra Senora de la Concepcion – referred to simply as the – Concepcion. The Concepcion wreck scatter does not lie in ‘association’ with the other 1715 shipwreck sites on the Treasure Coast, but lies some 16 miles to the north of Sebastian Inlet on the Brevard County- ‘Space Coast’.



https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/the-303rd-anniversary-of-the-santisima-trinidad-y-nuestra-senora-de-la-concepcion-shipwreck/

This is on the Melbourne site info.

The 1715 Fleet was known to have carried significant treasure and historically valuable artifacts, although there is no guarantee of 100% accuracy of the origin of the wreck materials currently being found.



https://seafarerexplorationcorp.com/melbourne-beach/

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News