Do you believe the compensation is commensurate with the company's performance? Was there a timing issue associated with the compensation? Who controlled the narrative coming from the company? Who was favorably positioned most by delaying the shortfall of cars produced? The pay was obscene compared to what was delivered. There should have been a claw-back.
That isn’t the point you were arguing though, you presented the situation as having not been over $500MILLION. It is over $500MILLION, as you’ve now acknowledged, along with acknowledging the amount is obscene, especially considering how far the company is from having revenue to support such an amount, which is the main point(s) I was originally making.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
