InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TonyMcFadden

11/04/03 7:36 PM

#16601 RE: TraderJoe812 #16599

lucky, wow...

I've had email exchanges with doma, who is most certainly not SKS...

He was also on the RB board since '99

http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/memalias.cgi?member=doma

And what's with this?

If this message is deleted, I will never return to this board and sell the vast amount of shares I own in this security and advise my fellow investors to do so as well. This is not a threat... it is only a reality that investors must face... that this is not a viable business model for Wave and that all the press releases in the world will not gain market acceptance of this technology near-term. Therefore, any prudent investor would assume that since this technology will not be accepted near-term, competitors will enter the space and invent technologies that circumvent any patents which Wave may own.

The logic, what there is, escapes me...

If your post is deleted then Wave's business model is not viable? Excuse me, but, huh?


icon url

Doma

11/04/03 7:40 PM

#16604 RE: TraderJoe812 #16599

Lucky........Absolutely Not..LOL!

I think SKS would be insulted....i would be if
i was SKS..:)
On the tech side of things i have e-mailed Wave's
Management on many occasions so that i may
grasp the issue,i then relay this information to
the board as best i can that's all......
Attestation of a TPM is very important to
Wave's Revenue from TCG,so that Infineon info
from the PDF is very encouraging along with MSFT's
requirement of Attested TPM's for NGSCB.

Doma.