InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Red_Right_Hand

06/10/22 8:30 AM

#485216 RE: pgsd #485212

pgsd, in the second slide there is superscript 5 after DCVAX-L Phase 3. Can you share what the superscript refers to?
icon url

extrooper

06/10/22 8:45 AM

#485223 RE: pgsd #485212

I can’t wait to read a response from the ill-informed individual and his excuse for the inaccuracy.
icon url

hoffmann6383

06/10/22 9:13 AM

#485231 RE: pgsd #485212

good work pgsd
icon url

ilovetech

06/10/22 9:20 AM

#485238 RE: pgsd #485212

Pgsd - Nice catch! Irresponsible to say the least. Hopefully, we won't see this linger. We know how absent mindedness can manifest.

ILT
icon url

Basin Street Blues

06/10/22 9:22 AM

#485239 RE: pgsd #485212

Good email PGSD , thanks
icon url

reachjo

06/10/22 9:36 AM

#485247 RE: pgsd #485212

Excellent research and correction pgsd! You are the tops!
icon url

ATLnsider

06/10/22 9:41 AM

#485251 RE: pgsd #485212

Thank you pgsd
icon url

pgsd

06/10/22 9:45 AM

#485253 RE: pgsd #485212

No probs :-)
icon url

LearningEveryTrade

06/10/22 9:51 AM

#485259 RE: pgsd #485212

Good Ol' PFS for ya. It will be interesting to see if any of these type of papers get updated or changed to reflect new endpoints.
icon url

eagle8

06/10/22 1:45 PM

#485394 RE: pgsd #485212

Thank you pgsd, well done.

GLTU
icon url

MalteseFalcon

06/10/22 2:36 PM

#485424 RE: pgsd #485212

PGSD - thanks for posting. This piqued my interest so I've dug a little deeper. A friend has sent me the four page referenced article from a journal called Clinical Neuropharmacology (strikes me as an odd place for a piece about GBM). After reading it I would like to make several points:
1. The four authors of the paper, Drs. Long Tan, Jie Peng, Ping Liu and Qi Wu work at the The First Hospital of Changsha, Hunan Province China. None of them identify as neuro-oncologists (two identify as neurosurgeons, one as a respiratory doctor and one as an ER doctor).
2. The basis of the article is, and I quote, "We search PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through December 2019 for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of dendritic cell vaccine for newly diagnosed glioblastoma."
3. Using this methodology they found three studies which matched this criteria - Buchroithner 2018, Cho 2012 and Wen 2019.
4. Two of the studies Cho and Buchroithner had very small enrollments (18 and 34 respectively) so the validity of these study results could be called into question.
5. However, and most importantly, NONE of these studies were conducted using DCVax.
6. Lastly, DCVax isn't even mentioned in the article.

In sum this journal article was done by doctors who are not neuro-oncolgists, conducted via web search, using studies with small sample sizes and most importantly NOT EVEN ABOUT DCVax. Furthermore neither DCVax nor NWBO are even mentioned in the journal article. Why on earth was this study was even referenced in the Cloughesy presentation is a mystery to me.