Replies to post #94880 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[zombywolf]

Continued.

At this point, as you requested is my opinion on what to do. First, stop the intervention in the CBV case. Of what advantage to you get joining Deirdre vs the inventors? You won't stop the decision that happens, and get nothing if Deirdre wins. She keeps the 22% she won, not the shareholders as defendants with her. Pointless waste of effort and money. Better to sit and watch what happens. Second, the NC case. It is already filed as a derivative action vs Billy, and will be heard before any other derivative case the shareholders lawyers can file. You don't get a do over from any decision that happens there. NC follows DE law in that case, so a subsequent DE case will be thrown out. So there is no point to do anything with a derivative case. What is left to do is what I have been harping on for awhile-get someone at home in the corporation to pay out anything if Deirdre wins the case vs Billy. Make sure you archive this post for when this is all over to see how on point it turns out to be. Listening to the only one that has talked to everyone, been to every hearing and read every filing is more rational that listening to those without a clue about what is going on.

[I-Glow]

You do understand that a expert witness for the Plaintiffs is paid to present the best case scenario for the Plaintiffs.

But in a settlement he is meaningless.

Carter and the attorneys agreed to a settlement - so it is pointless to bring up the Expert witness - the Defendants could have hired a expert witness and said the patents were worthless.

IG

[MK1720]

Arguements to a post;

Not Quite, Scruff. You have to evaluate what you can do vs the now reality of the situation. The situation is that the settlement was nowhere near the amount that Dr Teese recommended as a settlement in the summary judgement hearing, or predictions on this board.

This is a factual statement, stating the settlement amount is known! How do you know? This is a NDA? Collusion?

Next;

Since they filed the CBV case vs Deirdre, both sides agreed to keep that money in escrow pending a decision in that case. Billy's take from the settlement is unknown from filings. What is able to be fought is by shareholders is that which is not legally contracted in the settlement.

So now Billy gets a settlement, I thought he spent it all? In various countries? Why do you have all this detailed info of the settlement?

Next;

Deirdre has already filed a derivative case vs Billy on his illegal take, and is paying the bill. At the end of her filing, she states she wants nothing from the derivative action but the costs incurred in bringing it. That means that her lawyer gets paid, not the shareholder lawyers filing a later case, arguing the same case.

So Deidre does not want nothing more than to pay lawyers? Now Billy has an illegal take in the settlement?

Southern Gentleman to now illegal take? Deidre wants nothing more than to bring Billy to justice? Hearsay in court to protect Billy and Brauerman, yet now he has an illegal take in funds conducted by his legal team?