InvestorsHub Logo

dogn

05/25/22 10:38 PM

#378529 RE: Dancing in the dark #378522

Dancing, thanks for posting this relevant & recent patent.

dogn

north40000

05/25/22 10:42 PM

#378530 RE: Dancing in the dark #378522

Quite a laundry list. Thanks for remembering that patent.

tm100

05/26/22 12:02 PM

#378559 RE: Dancing in the dark #378522

I read that statement and wondered if it had to do with one of the other studies being conducted. Alzheimers, colon cancer, possibly covid(mitigate), are in process. Doubt any participant is using vascepa only, surely other meds being used.

ilovetech

05/26/22 2:03 PM

#378578 RE: Dancing in the dark #378522

WOW! To say "vast" would be understated. This effort is breathtaking. Since management was aware of impending patent grants, it was unable to publicly speak about them prematurely. It may explain why the company has consciencely decided to abandon further exploration of the lawless defiling of Amarin's rightful patents. Understanding at some point that the fix was in, they figured the best way to overcome circumstances out of it's control would be to rain down on the market, with so many innovative patents, that it would render any contender inputent to try the same playbook again. BPs love foreseeable trends they can craft and build around a pipeline of drugs. Can anyone point to a more plausible option that could catapult any BP ahead of the rest in the cardiovascular space?

ILT

ilovetech

05/26/22 3:09 PM

#378594 RE: Dancing in the dark #378522

Dancing, frankly I would have expected a greater reaction to these patents assuming all were granted?