InvestorsHub Logo

exwannabe

05/25/22 1:38 PM

#478461 RE: flipper44 #478454

First, admit you know where five censors came from the difference between the number at risk versus the number surviving at five years, and no censors are evident at one, two, three or four years.


Where do you get that "no censors in year 1-2-3-4" from?

Again, it is impossible to have 25 at risk, 5 censors and a %OS of 13.1%. If the 5 censors were all at the very end you would still only have a 12.3% OS. There were more censors, period.

On your second paragraph, you are just reaching for theories to explain what happened.