Replies to post #94793 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[VC3]

Thanks - found it - I'm not surprised.

[shajandr]

Nope, wronGGG.

https://www.patenttrademarkblog.com/international-pct-application/

''Will a PCT application directly result in an issued patent?

No, a PCT application is by nature a temporary placeholder. It serves as a delay mechanism to buy more time before entering the national stage of each desired member country. In that respect, a PCT application is similar to an option contract in the financial world.''

Basic Rule: Never invest in an IP case unless one understands the rules, procedures, rights, and the CONtrolling law.

More basic rule: Never buy pennystocks.

Most basic rule: In a pennystock based entirely on IP, as UOIP was, if there are no patent attorneys buying the pennystock retail (i.e., paying out of their own personal pocket to buy the pennystock in the retail market), then it is a loser/weak case.

Corollary Rule #72: Never take investing advice or IP advice from cats. Cats are far worse at stock picking than are monkeys throwing darts. Plus one cannot trust a cat - chances are the cat is unloading the same position that it is advising humans to buy.

Conclusion: UOIP was and will remain a subpenny turd. (Zero is subpenny.)

[I-Glow]

No you are wrong - "So, I am right that PCT is not just a "placeholder" for patents . It is for the protection of international patents."

More bad news - A PCT application does not itself result in the grant of a patent, since there is no such thing as an "international patent"

You still have to file a patent application in each County - ergo a PCT patent application is indeed a placeholder and it is meaningless on its own.

It is basically a provisional patent.

And there isn't a International patent.

IG