Replies to post #378033 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[north40000]

We know that 1000s of patients or gV customers are paying for and using gV. Those people seem to be direct infringers The pharmacies that sell the gV product to those customers would seem to be direct infringers also. Do we know of any non-infringing use for a gV product or V product that 1) does not involve animal or human ingestion and 2) does not fall within the scope of the currently invalid claims of 6 Amarin patents? Some use like filling sandbags?

Would it be appropriate for Amarin to amend the complaint in Delaware, or bring a new suit, alleging that tens of 1000s of John Does or Jane Does are buying and using gV for other than treating the uses or methods of the currently invalid claims of 6 Amarin patents, Include the unknown pharmacies that are currently selling gV to the above customers. Obtain discovery from Symphony or pharmacy counter monitoring to obtain identification of those actual customers and pharmacies, and name them in the complaint. Obtain a TRO or PI against the above identified entities.

Sounds like a lot of work. Could be expensive. I must be bored with current conditions.