f....“Today, the Court holds that a federal bureaucracy can make an obvious factual error, one that will result in an individual’s removal from this country, and nothing can be done about it,” the dissent notes"
In this case,the plaintiff made a minor error....The court refused to believe that the plaintiff made an error, but checked the wrong box on purpose.
Our appeal differs in that the defendant made a major "error" and tricked the judge into thinking the Kura table accurately reflected the results of the Kura study....so much so, that the cropped table was cited verbatim by the judge in the decision...as a reason for the judge's decision.