Don't disagree. Unless we're about to see Les' "they might fall into a trap" or whatever, there's little reason playing apologetics. I was watching the talk and the share price, and despite seeing good news and approvable data IMO, I saw the stock nose diving.
I've never seen a stock dive so steep on good news, I really did think that we'd be seeing the teens and might languish there despite what my lying eyes were seeing! I sold at a small loss, but then was able to buy back at the bottom more or less. I didn't want to do that, but I'm not going to go down with the ship just so I can prove myself to be the most battle hardened long. That ship sailed away already lol
Needless to say, yesterday was brutal, expected, yet very disappointingly handled. I still beleive the science is good enough for this to be SoC (will be best in combo format), but I am not a fan of a management who by most measures appears incompetent. A board made of mods and longs I think could have handled basic PR, IR, and technical details that would have ironed out many of the failures we saw.
Perhaps it's just a failure of my understanding of embargoes, SEC regulation and the like, but a PR that explained LL dropout due to sickness combined with explaining the sub by PM seems like an easy harmless obvious good that could have occurred. But yes, hindsight is 2020, though watching what prominent shorts are saying and criticizing might lead one to plan a defensive PR.
Sorry to vent, I think anyone still here needs to and likely is due to me barely being able to keep up with the inflow of forum posts.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
