Thank you once again for commenting on very important issues and events recently affecting LQMT. One would have thought the post would have received a minimum of 50 responses pro or con. Yours was the only one. Just shows you how little interest there is not from those who don’t own shares, but from those who do. The post raises some important questions. From a business point of view to an ethical one. Both have the potential to be true. From reducing costs to operate and grow to reducing a means to continue to grow and operate.
It’s not an accident why LQMT trades on anemic volumes and in the extreme low pennies beneath a dollar a share for over 20 years. Either the material is no good and or the company is poorly marketed and operated by the executives of LQMT.
If we believe what others have positively found around the www and posted about the success of amorphous metal abroad by the same former ceo and now chairman of the board li of LQMT. Then we at least know it’s not the material that is at fault.
Then again there is this conundrum; why is it that even abroad there are no whale contracts outside of CE and only in CE? And over here in the USA there are no whale contracts at all with or without CE? Hmmmmm?
Good luck to you. Oh yeah, I know….patience :). :). :).
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
