When your tone or style is combative, I feel a knee-jerk response in kind. But I'll set that aside and seriously consider your thoughts because you express them consistently and clearly hold them meaningfully. I'll stay open and maybe I'll learn something and you'll have some influence.
What comes to mind first is that I have no interest in fighting the battle you seem to want to fight. To me, it's not worth it, not a good use of my time. I'm not that dissatisfied. Maybe that makes me lazy. I could see why you'd say that. And more power to you. Agitation, even a good revolution can help, no doubt.
The second thought I have is I don't think of myself as prey or a dupe to some unfair system or some incompetent or self-serving CEO or high-powered set of institutions. I don't think of the biotech world as effectively out to get me in their own self-interest. I don't feel a need to fight back against unfairness or to whip someone to come into line to fight for my interests.
I think PH, for example, is at once self-interested and also trying the best he can for investors (in part for the money and in part out of integrity). I have no doubt I'm wrong on occasion in the bio world and the world as a whole. You can think that makes me stupid or lazy. I just don't have any interest in seeing the world suspiciously or as disappointing. I'm not sure I can frankly. And I have no doubt that's gotten me in trouble at times.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
