InvestorsHub Logo

skitahoe

04/18/22 5:09 PM

#460532 RE: Nick119 #460530

Nick,

Our process will cost people, or their insurance somewhere in six figures I believe. I know people love their pets, but spending that kind of money for a few more years with the pet would only be for the wealthiest of owners and most of the wealthy people I know don't spend their money that easily.

As I see it, a substantial discount in the price for pets wouldn't make sense as it would require just as much work. I don't doubt that veterinarian's could work with liquid nitrogen providers to have a flask available at the time of the surgery, but it still will be very expensive.

I knew a veterinarian who assured me that he knew pet owners who'd spend into the tens of thousands to save their pets, but going into 6 figures doesn't really make sense. I don't believe that many pets would ever receive the treatment.

Gary

inclinedampforest

04/18/22 5:10 PM

#460533 RE: Nick119 #460530

Nick119. “ One of the ……”
Let’s reverse the problem of cost.
About 4 years ago I came across a link from this site that took me to an article , and then many articles, about absolutely desperate cancer patients using a veterinarian product to self treat their cancer. The product was IVermectin.
The product was cheap as chips. No one was interested in investigating. I totally understand why. There was NO money , in a corporate world, in even thinking of investigating a product for cancer in humans that was already cheap as chips.
The reverse is equally true.
There will be no interest whatsoever in investigating a very expensive ( but more importantly profitable) product in a market ( animal) that requires a cheap as chips price. This is where the MHRA is clever. Measure your value in years of quality life. That is not going to work for a bull, sow, ewe, rooster…. It we are happy to calculate the value of a human life in millions.
Please forget animal treatments. Almost no one cares about animal lives ( although a stud might pay $1 million for a horse or a filmstar $1 mil for a dog) so forget it.
In some respects I feel sorry for Pfizer promising , way back, to supply ivermectin to humans at zero profit. What a shame that there are no acceptable trials to show that it has any benefit to humans in any set of c8rcumstances. Clearly no point in supplying, and even less in investigating .
NWBO understand that they re operating in an absolutely brutal world. No one can be trusted , even those that look most trustworthy. When I watch Linda Powers and listen to her silence I think “ Enders Game” . My money is in . I made my choices at avg $0.35. I will just sit and wait , but quite comfortably.
Best Wishes to you all.