If that's correct, there's nothing to worry about!
I'm sure another 2 weeks will make all the difference. ;-)
I haven't done the math, I was going by a date that was posted. Now you're giving another date and I don't know who's right. Fortunately I don't care, as I have nothing to lose.
If that SEC lawya is so hot, and the problems are fixable, why haven't they been fixed by now?
Maybe the OTC has serious reservations about allowing the individual who caused the SHRK debacle (costing shareholders every cent of their investments) to run another public company, especially one with published ambitions of Nasdaq.
Maybe the OTC isn't real keen on allowing someone who, along with his investment company and associates, was sued for fraud and misrepresentation to run another public company.
Maybe the SEC is none too happy about the misleading tweets that occurred last year, which caused a brief massive surge in volume and price. When Elon Musk did that, he was charged with securities fraud "for a series of false and misleading tweets."
Maybe the SEC is already considering similar charges for EEGI's prez.
Maybe the SEC is seeking a bar prohibiting Smith from serving as an officer or director of a public company, as they did with Musk.
Maybe those are some of the real reasons why a SEC attorney was needed (urgently).
Maybe the "new staff" at OTC isn't the real problem, it's the old owner.
Could it be that the reason the prez sold EEGI to a crook in 2019 was because he knew its problems were insurmountable?
Wouldn't it be something if the head of the company admitted it's practically impossible to clean up the SS?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
