InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pumper_stumper

04/14/22 3:42 PM

#147328 RE: Wisdom of Locke #147325

Where has this been revealed before? Don't requote it from today's doc, paste the link of a PRIOR filing that revealed this information so we can see it there! THESE are terms and conditions! THIS is part of what I was asking the SEC to demand the company to reveal! Now they suddenly revealed all classes today? Gee, what made them "decide" to do that now, when, as you say, SOME of these preferred were issued years ago. WHY TODAY finally tell us the details about them? ;-)

If any of this would have been revealed before, then wouldn't ONE of you shareholders have stepped up and replied to my several prior posts about this information being hidden from shareholders? Why wasn't there any "debunking" of my prior posts about the lack of disclosure of the terms? ;-) The answer, is obvious, right?

BTW, I have more irons in the fire! ;-) Shhhhh!

Designation and Rank. The Series A Preferred Stock shall rank: (i) senior to any other class or series of outstanding preferred shares or series of capital stock of the Company; (ii) prior to all of the Company's common stock, no par value per share; (iii) prior to any class or series of capital stock of the Company hereafter created not specifically ranking by its terms senior to or on parity with any Series A Preferred Stock of whatever subdivision (collectively, with the common stock
and the existing preferred stock, “Junior Securities”); and (iv) on parity with any class or series of capital stock of the Company hereafter created specifically ranking by its terms on parity with the Series A Preferred Stock (“Parity Securities”) in each case as to distributions of assets upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary (all such distributions being referred to collectively as “Distributions”).

icon url

Dyno89

04/14/22 4:50 PM

#147337 RE: Wisdom of Locke #147325

GREAT DD. Great factual ENZC information, once again proving false claims just that. False. I can’t believe a nobody retail investor actually claimed to have forced the companies hand to release this old information that was already known. Lmao!!!