InvestorsHub Logo

Researchfyi

04/14/22 11:05 AM

#223505 RE: Steaua #223502

I don’t think the accuracy of those LQMT numbers was the message. Would $260,000 or $26,000 more made a big difference? The focus on LQMT was a overview. I don’t think it was an independent audit. Even with some exaggeration the message focused on LQMT was very clear. The discrepancies do not change the meaning of LQMT’s recent growth history or growth expectations going forward. That too was outlined in the CC.

If you have better data about LQMT’s future, it would be very much appreciated. I’m reviewing the 10K statements my self and looking for positive probabilities. The accuracy of numbers at this time is not as important as the accuracy of a timeline for probable contracts.

With the earnings LQMT is reporting, $20 or $30 thousand is not going to make a hill of beans difference. Neither is using math rounded off by an external source or actual 10K’s of LQMT.

Spartan

04/15/22 2:40 PM

#223519 RE: Steaua #223502

"let me know if they match ;)"

I didn't make up the numbers right?

The validity of my message stands. You didn't offer a valid counterpoint, just subjective criticism. Show me some concrete rationale about how great LQMT is doing.

The numbers tell a story of a failing company burning through millions in cash with no identifiable prospects.